/TIL that one acre of hemp can produce as much paper (including toilet paper!) as four acres of trees.

TIL that one acre of hemp can produce as much paper (including toilet paper!) as four acres of trees.

<br /> The Project Gutenberg eBook of Hemp Hurds as Paper-Making Material, by Lyster H. Dewey and Jason L. Merrill.<br />

The Project Gutenberg EBook of Hemp Hurds as Paper-Making Material, by 
Lyster H. Dewey and Jason L. Merrill

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org

Title: Hemp Hurds as Paper-Making Material
       United States Department of Agriculture, Bulletin No. 404

Author: Lyster H. Dewey and Jason L. Merrill

Release Date: February 25, 2006 [EBook #17855]

Language: English

Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1


Produced by K.D. Thornton and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net


October 14, 1916

Washington, D.C.



By Lyster H. Dewey, Botanist in
Charge of Fiber-Plant Investigations
, and Jason L.
, Paper-Plant Chemist, Paper-Plant Investigations.


Page Page
The production and
handling of hemp hurds.
The manufacture of
paper from hemp hurds.
by Lyster H. Dewey: by Jason L.
What hemp hurds
1 Introduction 7
Pith, wood, and
2 Factors justifying an
investigation of hemp hurds
Character of hurds
affected by retting
2 Character of the material 11
Proportion of hurds to
fiber and yield per acre
3 Character of the tests 12
Hurds available from
machine-broken hemp
3 Operations involved in a test 13
Present uses of hemp
4 Description of tests 16
Present supplies of
hurds available
5 Comparison of the tests and commercial
Baling for shipment 5 Physical tests of the
papers produced
Cost of baling 5 Conclusions 25
Summary 6    

In preparing the report on the manufacture of paper from hemp
hurds it became evident that a short discussion of the agricultural
aspects of this material should be included in the publication. Such
an article was prepared, therefore, and the two reports are here presented


By Lyster H. Dewey,
Botanist in Charge of Fiber-Plant Investigations.


The woody inner portion of the hemp stalk, broken into pieces and
separated from the fiber in the processes of breaking and scutching,
is called hemp hurds. These hurds correspond to shives in flax, but
are much coarser and are usually softer in texture.

-2- The
hemp stalk grown in a broadcast crop for fiber production is
from one-eighth to three-eighths of an inch in diameter and from 4
to 10 feet tall. The stalk is hollow, with a cylindrical woody shell, thick
near the base, where the stalk is nearly solid, and thinner above, where
the hollow is relatively wider.

In the process of breaking, the woody cylinder inside of the fiber-bearing
bark is broken into pieces one-half of an inch to 3 inches long
and usually split into numerous segments. The thicker lower sections
are split less than the thin-shelled upper ones, and they are often
left quite solid.


The inner surface of the hurds usually bears a layer of pith, consisting
of thin-walled cells nearly spherical or angular, but not elongated.
They are more or less crushed and torn. They are probably of little
value for paper, but they constitute less than 1 per cent of the weight
of the hurds. The principal weight and bulk consist of slender elongated
woody cells. The outer surface is covered with fine secondary
fibers composed of slender elongated cells, tougher than those of the
wood but finer and shorter than those of the hemp fiber of commerce.
No method has been devised thus far which completely separates
from the hurds all of the long fiber. From 5 to 15 per cent of the
weight of the hurds consists of hemp fiber, in strands from 3 inches
to 8 feet in length. Some fragments of the bark, made up of short
cubical cells, usually dark in color, cling to the strands of fiber.


Nearly all of the hemp in the United States is dew retted. The
stalks are spread on the ground in swaths as grain is laid by the cradle.
The action of the weather, dew, and rain, aided by bacteria, dissolves
and washes out the green coloring matter (chlorophyll) and most of
the gums, leaving only the fibrous bark and the wood. The plants in
this process lose about 60 per cent of their green weight, or about 40
per cent of their air-dry weight.

The stalks are sometimes set up in shocks to cure before retting,
and after retting they are set up in shocks to dry. Each time the
stalks are handled they are chucked down on the ground to keep the
butts even. In these operations sand and clay are often driven up
into the hollow at the base of the stalks, and this dirt, which often
clings tenaciously, may constitute all objectionable feature in the use
of hemp hurds for paper stock.

In Italy and in most localities in Russia and Austria-Hungary
where hemp is extensively cultivated, it is retted in water, but water
retting has never been practiced in the United States except to a
limited extent before the middle of the last century. Hurds from
water-retted hemp are cleaner and softer than those from

The fiber is sometimes broken from dry hemp stalks without retting.
The hurds thus produced contain a small percentage of soluble gums,
chiefly of the pectose series. Comparatively little hemp is prepared
in this manner in America.

Process retting by means of weak solutions of chemicals or oils in
hot water is practiced to a limited extent. The hurds from these
processes may contain traces of the chemicals or oils and also soluble
gums in greater degree than those of the dew-retted or water-retted


The yield of hemp fiber varies from 400 to 2,500 pounds per acre,
averaging 1,000 pounds under favorable conditions. The weight of
hurds is about five times that of the fiber, or somewhat greater from
hemp grown on peaty soils. A yield of 2½ tons of hurds per acre may
be taken as a fair average.

The stalks are fed sidewise in a
continuous layer 2 to 3 inches thick,
turning out about 4,000 pounds of clean fiber per day and five times
as much hurds.
Fig. 1.—Hemp-breaking machine.
The stalks are fed sidewise in a continuous layer 2 to 3 inches thick,
turning out about 4,000 pounds of clean fiber per day and five times
as much hurds.


Hemp hurds are available only from hemp which is broken by
machines, when the hurds may be collected in quantity in one place
(figs. 1 and 2). Most of the hemp in Kentucky is still broken by
hand brakes. These small brakes are moved from shock to shock, so
that the hurds are scattered all over the field in small piles of less
than 50 pounds each, and it is the common practice to set fire to them
as soon as the brake is moved. It would be difficult to collect them
at a cost which would permit their use for paper stock.

Where machine brakes are used, the hemp stalks are brought to the
machine as grain is brought to a thrashing machine, and the hurds
accumulate in large piles, being blown from the machine by

Machine brakes are used in Wisconsin, Indiana, Ohio, and California,
but to only a limited extent in Kentucky. Five different kinds
of machine brakes are now in actual use in this country, and still
others are used in Europe. All of the best hemp in Italy, commanding
the highest market price paid for any hemp, is broken by machines.
The better machine brakes now in use in this country prepare the
fiber better and much more rapidly than the hand brakes, and they
will undoubtedly be used in all localities where hemp raising is introduced
as a new industry. They may also be used in Kentucky when
their cost is reduced to more reasonable rates, so that they may
compete with the hand brake. Hemp-breaking machines are being
improved and their use is increasing. The hemp-growing industry
can increase in this country only as machine brakes are developed to
prepare the fiber. A profitable use for the hurds will add an incentive
to the use of the machine brake.

Machine brake and hemp hurds.
Hemp hurds from machine brakes quickly accumulate in
large piles.
Fig. 2.—Machine brake and hemp hurds.
Hemp hurds from machine brakes quickly accumulate in
large piles.


Hemp hurds are used to a limited extent for barnyard litter and
stable bedding, as a substitute for sawdust in packing ice, and, in
rare instances, for fuel. They are not regarded as having a commercial
value for any of these uses, though they are doubtless worth at
least $1 per ton on the farm when used for stable bedding. They are
a waste product, without value for other purposes which might compete
with their use for paper stock.



During the last season, 1915, about 1,500 acres of hemp have been
harvested outside of Kentucky and in regions where machine brakes
are used. Estimating the yield of hurds at 2½ tons per acre, this
should give a total quantity of about 3,750 tons. Large quantities of
hemp from the crop of 1914, which are still unbroken in these areas,
and large piles of hurds undisturbed where the machines have been
used during the last two or three years, increase the total to more
than 7,000 tons. Hemp is now grown outside of Kentucky in the
vicinity of McGuffey, east of Lima, Ohio; around Nappanee, Elkhart
County, and near Pierceton, in Kosciusko County, Ind.; about Waupun
and Brandon, Wis.; and at Rio Vista and Stockton, Cal.

In Kentucky, hemp is grown in most of the counties within a radius
of 50 miles of Lexington. No accurate statistics of the acreage are
collected, but the crop harvested in 1915 is estimated at 7,000 acres.
A machine brake will probably be used in Bourbon County and also
in Clark County, but most of the hemp in Kentucky will be broken on
hand brakes.


The hurds will have to be baled to facilitate handling in transportation
and to economize storage space at the paper mills. The bales
will need to be covered with burlap or some material to keep them
from shaking out. They may be baled in the same presses that are
used for baling hemp fiber, but care must be exercised to avoid breaking
the press, for the hurds are more resistant than hemp fiber. A
bale of hemp 2 by 3 by 4 feet weighs about 500 pounds. A bale of
hurds of the same size will weigh about one-third less, or approximately
six bales per ton.

Rough hemp fiber as it is shipped from the farm is not covered;
therefore, the covering material must be purchased especially for the
hurds. A piece of burlap about 36 by 48 inches placed on either side
of the bale will be sufficient, but these pieces, weighing about 3
pounds each, cost about 40 cents a pair. Baling rope, in addition to
jute covering, will cost at least 5 cents per bale, making the total cost
of covering and ties $2.70 or more per ton. Possibly chip-board,
costing about $33 per ton, or not more than 5 cents for the two pieces
for each bale, may be used in place of burlap. Chip-board, burlap,
and also rope ties may all be used for paper stock. Burlap covers
might be returned, to be used repeatedly until worn out, but chip-board
could not be used more than once.


If burlap covers are used the cost of baling, including covering, ties,
use of baling press, power, and labor will amount to at least 60 cents
per bale, or about $3.75 per ton. If chip-board can be used the cost
-6- may be
reduced to about $2 per ton. The cost of hauling and loading
on the cars will vary from $1 to $3 per ton, depending upon the distance
and the roads. The farmer must therefore receive from $4 to
$6 per ton for the hurds, baled, on board cars at his home station.


Hemp hurds are the woody inner portion of the hemp stalk, broken
into pieces in removing the fiber.

They are not used at present for any purpose that would compete
with their use for paper.

Hurds are available only from machine-broken hemp, for the cost
of collecting them from the hand brakes would be too great.

About 7,000 tons are now available in restricted localities in Ohio,
Indiana, Wisconsin, and California.

The quantity is likely to increase as the use of machine brakes

The hurds may be baled in hemp-fiber presses, with partial burlap
covers like those on cotton bales, or possibly chip-board covers.

It is estimated that the farmers may deliver the bales on board
cars profitably at $4 to $6 per ton.



By Jason L. Merrill,
Paper-Plant Chemist, Paper-Plant Investigations.


The purpose of this paper is to report upon preliminary tests which
were conducted to determine the paper-making value of hemp hurds,
a crop waste of the hemp-fiber industry.

The search for plant materials capable of being utilized in paper
manufacture is a comparatively recent but world-wide activity which
has for its object the husbanding of present sources of paper-stock
supply by the substitution of new materials for some of those which
are rapidly becoming less plentiful and more costly.

The abstract idea of utilizing that which is at present a waste can
play no important rôle in such activities, the successful commercial
outcome of which must be based on the three fundamental factors—market
or demand for product, satisfactory raw material, and cost.

Since hemp hurds are to be treated in this report as a raw material
for the manufacture of book and printing papers, the qualities, supply,
probable future, and cost of the material will be considered in comparison
with wood, with which it must compete. There seems to be
little doubt that the present wood supply can not withstand indefinitely
the demands placed upon it, and with increased scarcity
economy in the use of wood will become imperative. This effect is
already apparent in many wood-using industries, and although the
paper industry consumes only about 3 per cent of the total forest cut,
it is probable that it will be affected through this economy. Our
forests are being cut three times as fast as they grow, and as wood
becomes more expensive proper growing and reforesting will receive
more attention. Thus, naturally, a balance will be established between
production and consumption, but as this condition approaches
its limiting values the price of wood may rise to such levels that there
will be a demand for other raw materials.

The use of waste paper in conjunction with chemical wood pulp
has increased to enormous proportions, and it is probable that the
increase will continue. Although it is a cheaper raw material than
wood, it is reasonable to suppose that as the wood supply decreases
and the price of wood pulp advances, the price of waste paper will
advance somewhat proportionately.

In view of these conditions it is advisable to investigate the paper-making
value of the more promising plant materials before a critical
situation arises. To be of substantial value the
investigations should
include not only a determination of the quality and quantity of pulp
and paper which the material is capable of producing, but should
embrace a consideration of such relevant factors as agricultural conditions,
farm practice, assembling conditions, transportation, and
probable future supply.

Certain cultivated plants seem particularly promising, because in
the harvesting of the regular crop that portion which might be utilized
for paper manufacture necessarily is either wholly or partially assembled.
To this class of plants belong corn, broom corn, sorghum,
sugar cane, bagasse, flax, hemp, and the cereal straws.

It is generally conceded that the employment of different raw
materials would probably yield products of a somewhat different
quality than those now prevailing in the markets, but the qualities of
papers and the public demands are so diversified and numerous that
this possible objection should not be serious. Ten years ago sulphite
manufacturers would not accept consignments of spruce logs
if they contained over 5 per cent of fir, while to-day many manufacturers
tolerate 50 per cent. Rope papers are found to contain not
only jute, but when this raw material is not plentiful, chemical pulp
of various kinds. “Linen paper” is often no more than a trade term.
Not long ago printing papers were made entirely from chemical wood
pulp, but to-day if it is desired to secure paper which is free from
ground wood the specifications must so stipulate. Writing papers,
formerly made entirely from rags, now are likely to contain either
chemical or even ground-wood pulp unless the specifications prohibit
it. Without doubt, many paper manufacturers have maintained certain
papers up to a fixed standard for a long series of years, but it
is equally true that competition has lowered the standard of a great
many papers, some of which had acquired a distinctive recognition.
The employment of plant fibers will not necessarily lower the present
quality of papers, but if their employment does result in products
whose qualities are somewhat different from our so-called standard
papers it does not necessarily follow that such papers will not find
a ready market.


Hemp hurds form a crop waste, in that they necessarily are produced
in the raising and preparation of hemp fiber, and their present
use and value are comparatively insignificant.

The assembling of the hurds may be effected with economy, since
the area in which hemp is handled with the use of machine brakes is
restricted. Although it must be stated that the present annual
-9- supply
would not be sufficient to justify the installation of a pulp mill
nor would its transportation to existing mills appear feasible, it
is expected that the available annual tonnage, especially in certain
general sections, will increase, due to the increased use of the machine
brake. The present tonnage per annum is approximately as follows:
In the region of Ohio and Indiana, 2,500 tons; in the Wisconsin section,
1,000 tons; in the California region, 1,400 tons.

In years of adverse weather conditions there are often large areas
of hemp which are not harvested on account of its poor quality;
there are also large areas of cut hemp which become overretted, due
to inclement weather. It has been suggested by some of the hemp
raisers that this large amount of material might be utilized as a paper
stock. In these cases the cost of the whole material would probably
be somewhat higher than that of the hurds, because either all or part
of the cost of harvesting and the total cost of breaking would have to
be borne by the paper maker. Moreover, the quality of this material
would be so very irregular and the supply so uncertain that it probably
would not appeal to the paper manufacturer.

Without doubt, hemp will continue to be one of the staple agricultural
crops of the United States. The wholesale destruction of
the supply by fire, as frequently happens in the case of wood, is precluded
by the very nature of the hemp-raising industry. Since
only one year’s growth can be harvested annually the supply is not
endangered by the pernicious practice of overcropping, which has
contributed so much to the present high and increasing cost of pulp
wood. The permanency of the supply of hemp hurds thus seems

The favorable location geographically of the hemp regions in relation
to the pulp and paper industry is a factor of considerable
importance. The Kentucky region is not at present in a position
to supply hurds, as machine methods have not been adopted there
to any appreciable degree. The Ohio and Indiana region, which at
present has the greatest annual tonnage, with the prospect of an increase,
is situated south of the Wisconsin and Michigan wood-pulp
producing region and at a distance from the eastern wood-pulp
producing regions; therefore, it is in a favorable position to compete
in the large Ohio and Indiana markets. Since, as will be shown,
the hurd pulp acts far more like soda poplar stock than sulphite
stock, competition would be strongest from the eastern mills; in
fact, the hurd stock might very possibly meet with favor as a book-stock
furnish in the Michigan and Wisconsin paper mills, which are
within the sulphite fiber-producing region. Because of its very close
proximity to paper mills, this latter possibility applies with far
greater force to the Wisconsin hemp region, where a considerable
extension of the hemp industry is anticipated.


A representative sample of hemp hurds,
natural size, showing hemp fiber and pieces of wood tissue.
Fig. 3.—A representative sample of hemp hurds,
natural size, showing hemp fiber and pieces of wood tissue.



As received from Pierceton, Ind., the hurds consisted of a mixture of
tangled hemp bast fibers and pieces of broken wood of the hemp
stalk. (Fig. 3.) No reliable data were secured as to the proportion
of bast fiber in the total shipment of 4 tons, although two
hand separations of small representative samples gave results averaging
8 per cent. The chemical character of the material was such
and the quantity was so small that any appreciable variation of the
proportion should not affect materially the treating processes finally
adopted, yet its presence in varying proportions undoubtedly would
modify to some extent the quality of the resulting paper product.
Since the length of the ultimate bast fiber averages about 22 mm. and
the length of the ultimate hemp wood fiber averages 0.7 mm., it is
natural to assume that the bast fiber would tend to increase the
strength of paper produced from the hurds. (Fig. 4.)

Fiber derived from the woody portion of
the hurds. ×75. From a microphotograph.
Fig. 4.
—Fiber derived from the woody portion of the hurds. ×75.
From a microphotograph.

The broken pieces of wood contained in the hurds varied in length
from mere particles which were somewhat finer than sawdust to pieces
about 3½ inches long, exceptional pieces being found which measured
6 inches in length. The majority of the long pieces were between 2
and 3 inches in length. In thickness the pieces ranged from one-eighth
of an inch, in case they were derived from the base of the hemp stalks,
to about one sixty-fourth of an inch in those pieces which were
derived from the top and branches of the stalks. In cross section the
pieces often were found to be a quarter or half of the
rounded rectangular
woody shell of the stalk, although there appeared to be no
regularity in this respect.

From the pulp-maker’s standpoint the great irregularity in thickness,
length, and mass of the woody pieces militates decidedly against
economy in pulp production. The smaller pieces reduce by chemical
treatment sooner than the larger fragments and are thereby overtreated,
which results in a lower yield of cellulose fiber and a product
composed of undertreated and overtreated fibers, the production and
use of which are not satisfactory or economical. It probably would
be found more satisfactory, therefore, to screen or sort the hurds and
treat the various sizes separately and differently.

Associated with the hurds was a small quantity of chaff and dirt,
composed chiefly of sand, soil, particles of hemp leaves and flowers,
and other extraneous matter. The sand and soil were present
because of the practice of placing the stalks in shocks in the field, the
butts of the stalks being in contact with the soil. It is a simple
matter, however, to remove the chaff and dirt by sieving, and this
practice was followed in most of the paper tests conducted with this


Because of the similarity of hemp hurds to other materials which have
been tested by the Office of Paper-Plant Investigations, semicommercial
tests were conducted in cooperation with a paper manufacturer
without preliminary laboratory tests. Laboratory pulp and
paper tests are regarded only as a preliminary to semicommercial
tests and therefore are not employed unless the material in question
presents new features which should receive investigation before
larger sized tests are undertaken.

The advantages of cooperative mill tests are many, among which
may be mentioned the counsel and advice of the mill management
and employees, the services of specialized and skilled labor, facilities
for comparing the processes and the results of tests with commercial
processes and results, and the use of commercial or semicommercial
types and sizes of machinery. Tests conducted in this
manner and on this scale are of a different quality than is possible
in those conducted in a laboratory, and the results are susceptible
of commercial interpretation with a fair degree of reliability.
It is found, in general, that the cost of securing such equipment and
service for a complete and comprehensive test does not exceed $500,
while the installation of an equally satisfactory equipment alone
would cost at least $50,000 and in many cases very much more.
Tests conducted in this manner constitute a direct demonstration to
the manufacturer, and the results obtained are found to carry more
weight when presented to other manufacturers for consideration.

It is well known that the method of conducting tests
varies with the size of the test. In the matter of yield determination,
for example, laboratory tests may be on such a small scale that the
weighing and sampling of the resulting cellulose fibers may be conducted
by means of chemical laboratory apparatus and analytical
balance, while in tests involving a matter of 5 to 10 pounds of material
larger and different types of equipment are necessary. When
the tests are so increased in size as to employ 300 or 400 pounds,
still other types of equipment are necessary for the treatment of
the material and for a determination of the yield of fiber. In
tests involving tons of material the equipment involves the use of
machines. Accuracy in degree of control and in results will vary
materially with the size of the test. As the size of the test increases,
certain factors will vary in a beneficial manner, while others will vary
in a detrimental manner, so it is a question for each investigator to
decide, after taking all factors into consideration, as to the size of
test which will give the most satisfactory results. In work of this
nature it is found, on the whole, that better results are obtained in
large tests, although the control of the factors and the determination
of the yield of fiber are more difficult than in smaller tests.

In the tests described in this bulletin, the Department of Agriculture
employed a rotary digester of its own design,[2]
comprising a shell
5 feet 5 inches in length by 4 feet in diameter, capable of holding
about 300 pounds of air-dry hurds. It is believed that a test of this
size is large enough to give satisfactory results and that the results
are susceptible of commercial interpretation, while at the same time
they are sufficiently small for complete control and to afford fiber-yield
figures which are both accurate and reliable. Two such rotary
charges gave enough fiber for one complete paper-making test.


A complete test on hurds comprises seven distinct operations, and
the method will be described, operation by operation, in the order
in which they were conducted.

Sieving.—The hurds for the first test were not sieved to remove
sand and dirt, but the resulting paper was so dirty that sieving was
practiced in all subsequent tests. The hurds were raked along a
horizontal galvanized-iron screen, 15 feet long and 3 feet wide, with
11½ meshes per linear inch, the screen being agitated by hand from
below. Various amounts of dirt and chaff could be removed, depending
on the degree of action, but it was found that if much more than
3 per cent of the material was removed it consisted chiefly of fine
pieces of wood with practically no additional sand or dirt; in most of
the tests, therefore, the material was screened so as to remove
approximately 3 per cent. It became apparent that a finer
would probably serve as well and effect a saving of small but good

Cooking.—Cooking is the technical term for the
operation by which
fibrous raw materials are reduced to a residue of cellulose pulp by
means of chemical treatment. In these tests about 300 pounds of
hurds were charged into the rotary with the addition of a caustic-soda
solution, such as is regularly employed in pulp mills and which
tested an average of 109.5 grams of caustic soda per liter, or 0.916
pound per gallon, and averaged 85 per cent causticity. Sufficient
caustic solution was added to furnish 25 or 30 per cent of actual
caustic soda, calculated on the bone-dry weight of hurds in the charge.
After closing the rotary head, it was started rotating at the rate of
one-half revolution per minute, and in about five minutes steam at
120 pounds per square inch was admitted at such a rate that the charge
was heated in one hour to 170° C., which is the theoretical equivalent
of 100 pounds of steam pressure per square inch. It was found,
however, that when the temperature reached 170° C. the pressure
was usually 115 or 120 pounds instead of 100 pounds, due to air and
gases inclosed in the rotary. At this point the rotary was stopped
and steam and air relieved until the pressure dropped to 100 pounds,
or a solid steam pressure. The temperature was maintained at this
point for the number of hours required to reduce the hurds, which
was found to be about five, after which the rotary was stopped
and steam relieved until the pressure was reduced to zero, when the
head was removed and the stock was emptied into a tank underneath,
measuring 5½ by 6 by 2 feet deep, where it was drained and
washed. Samples of waste soda solution or “black liquor,” which
were taken from some of the “cooks” for analysis, were drawn while
the stock was being thus emptied into the drainer.

Determination of yield.—For determining the yield of
cellulose fiber
the stock in the drain tank was washed with water until free from
waste soda solution, when, by means of a vacuum pump communicating
with the space between the bottom and the false perforated
bottom, the water was sucked from the stock, leaving the fiber with
a very uniform moisture content throughout its entire mass and in a
condition suitable for removing, sampling, and weighing for a yield
determination. Tests have shown that it is possible to sample and
calculate the yield of bone-dry fiber within 0.05 per cent of the actual

It has been found that stocks from different materials vary greatly
in their ability to mat in the drain tank, thereby enabling a good
vacuum to be obtained, some stocks permitting a 25-inch vacuum to
be obtained, while others will not permit more than 5 inches. For
this reason the moisture content of the stock will vary from 65 to 85
per cent.

Washing and bleaching.—Washing and bleaching
were performed
for the purpose of bleaching the brown-colored cooked stock to a
white product, since it was regarded as highly probable that the fiber
would be suitable for book-paper manufacture. The colored stock
was charged into a 400-pound beating and washing engine of regular
construction and washed about one hour, the cylinder washer being
covered with 60-mesh wire cloth in order to remove fine loose dirt
and chemical residues. The washer was then raised, the stock
heated by steam to about 40° C., and a solution of commercial
bleaching powder was added in the quantity judged to be necessary,
after which the stock was pumped to a large wooden tank, to remain
and bleach over night. If the stock was bleached sufficiently white
it was drained and washed from bleach residues, and if not more
bleach was added until a good color was obtained. The bleaching
powder used was estimated to contain 35 per cent of available
chlorin, as this is the commercial practice, and the amount required
was calculated to the bone-dry weight of the unbleached stock.
More bleach is required for undercooked stock than for stock which
is properly cooked or overcooked; therefore, the percentage of
bleach required is an indication of the quality of the cooked stock.
Since bleaching is usually more expensive than cooking, it is desirable
to cook to such a degree that the consumption of bleach will be held
within certain limits, depending on the raw materials used and the
quality of paper to be produced. In these tests it was desirable so to
cook the hurds that the consumption of bleach would not be over
about 10 per cent of the fiber.

Furnishing.—Furnishing is the operation of charging the beating
engine with the desired kind or kinds of fiber in the proper proportion
and amount and the adding of such loading and sizing agents as may
be necessary. As shown in the record of results, the furnish in these
tests consisted of hurd stock alone and of various proportions of
hurds, sulphite fiber, and soda fiber. The percentages to be given in
the record of the furnishes refer to the percentage of the total fiber
furnish, and this likewise applies to the loading and sizing agents.
In case sulphite or soda fiber was used, the commercial product in
the dry state was charged into the beating engine and disintegrated,
after which the hurd stock was added in the wet condition.

Beating.—Beating is that operation concerning which the paper
makers often say “there is where the paper is really made,” and
although the statement may not be literally true it contains a great
deal of truth. It is the operation whereby the fibers are separated
from each other, reduced to the proper lengths, and put in such a
physical or chemical condition that they felt properly and form into a
satisfactory sheet. It is probable that the quality of the sheet
depends more upon the proper beater action than upon any other
single operation. The action consists in drawing a water suspension
of the fiber between two sets of rather blunt knives, one set being
located in the bottom of a circulating trough and the
other set on the
periphery of a roll revolving just above the former set of knives. It
is during this operation that the loading and sizing agents are incorporated
and the whole furnish is tinted either to produce a satisfactory
white or the desired color.

The term “paper making,” as used in this publication, means the
operation of forming the finished sheet of paper from stock which has
been furnished and prepared in the beater. In these tests a 30-inch
Fourdrinier machine of regular construction was used, a machine
which often is used for the production of paper for filling regular commercial
orders. The machine is designed to cause the water suspension
of fibers to flow on to a traveling wire cloth, whereby the water
drains away. More water is removed by passing the wet sheet through
a series of press rolls, after which the sheet is dried on steam-heated
drums and passed through polished iron rolls, which impart a finish
to the sheet. A Jordan refining machine was employed in conjunction
with the machine to improve further the quality of the fiber, and a
pulp screen was used in order to remove coarse and extraneous materials
from the fiber.


The nature of each complete paper test and the dependence of
each operation on the others were such that it does not seem advisable
to submit the results of the seven tests in tabular form. The numerous
cooks, however, which furnished the pulp for the paper tests are
presented in Table I in all essential detail.

TABLE I.—Data on cooking hemp hurds.

Cook No. Caustic soda used (percentage of bone-dry hurds). Strength of caustic soda (grams per liter). Causticity of soda solution. Cooking Yield of bone-dry fiber (percentage of
bone-dry unsieved hurds).
Time (hours). Temperature
293 20.6 100 75.3 3 166  
294 21 100 75.3 3 166  
295 21.6 100 75.3 3 166  
296 20.3 100 75.3 3 166  
301 21.9 100 82.5 4 166 [3]
302 24.4 100 82.5 4 166  
303 24.2 100 84.3 4 166 44.1
304 25 100 84.3 4 170 39.5
305 25 100 84.3 5 170 39.4
306 27.8 107.5 84.3 4 166 36.5
307 26.7 107 84.4 5 170 38.1
308 26 107 84.4 5 170 } 37.3
309 27.3 107 84.4 5 170
310 27.1 107 84.4 6 170 37.0
311 27.2 107 84.4 6 170 36.8
312 28.3 116.5 85.5 5 170 35.9
313 29.1 113.1 84.9 5 170 }
314 29.1 109 83.9 5 170
315 29.4 109 83.9 5 170 34.9
316 30 109.5 84.9 5 170 37.2
317 29.6 109.5 84.9 5 170 37.0
318 29.6 107 84.8 5 170 37.7
319 29.4 107.5 84.2 5 170 }
320 29.3 107.5 84.2 5 170

Discussion of the various cooks will be given in
connection with
the descriptions of those paper tests in which the stocks from the cooks
were used, since a stock and its cooking condition can be judged adequately
only after it has been put through the various processes and
into the finished sheet of paper.

The first test consisted in making four separate cooks, Nos. 293, 294,
295, and 296, of approximately 300 pounds each, dividing the total
stock into two parts and making two separate paper tests. The
first test was made primarily in order to learn some of the qualities
and characteristics of the stock and to get the machinery equipment
adjusted properly. The yield of fiber was not determined in this
preliminary test, since the knowledge of it was not essential at this
stage of the work. The cooked stock which was emptied into the
drainer to be washed free from black liquor was composed largely
of whole pieces of hurds, but only slight pressure between the fingers
was required to crush the pieces. In the case of wood, this condition
ordinarily would indicate undercooking, but might not in the case of
hurds. Further observation on the action of the cooked stock during
subsequent processes was necessary in order to judge of its quality or
the suitability of the cooking conditions. The total cooked stock,
about 500 pounds, was divided into two portions of 200 and 300
pounds, respectively, and work was continued on them separately.
The 200-pound test, designated as run No. 135, was put into a 350-pound
washing engine, washed one hour, and given a total light brush
of 2¼ hours. The washing removed a great amount of dirt, but the
engine did not reduce the hurd stock as much as was desired. After
heating the stock in the beater to 40° C., it was bleached with
solution, 94 gallons at 0.418 pound bleach per gallon,
equivalent to 19.7 per cent of the fiber. This percentage of bleach is
regarded as too high for stock intended for book-paper manufacture,
and subsequent cooks therefore were given harder treatment in order
to reduce this figure. After draining and washing free from bleach
residues, the stock was furnished in the beater with 13 per cent of
clay, 1 per cent of resin size, and 2.5 per cent of alum, was tinted
blue, given one hour’s light brush, and pumped to the stock chest.
When running it on the paper machine, the Jordan refiner seemed
to have little effect in reducing shives of undertreated wood, which
indicated further the necessity of harder cooking. The furnish acted
well on the paper machine at 70 feet per minute, but appeared somewhat
too “free” on the wire. The paper produced from this test is of
very low quality, due to the improper preparation of the stock, lack
of sufficient bleach, the use of too small an amount of blue tinting, and
the presence of an excessive amount of dirt, sand, and shives. The
excessive amount of dirt and sand suggested the sieving of the hurds
before cooking, and this was performed in all subsequent cooks. -18-
The finish of the sheet is very poor, due to the fact that the calender
stack was composed of very light rolls which did not have a satisfactory
surface, yet the stack is known to be able to produce better finishes
if the proper stock is employed.

Run No. 136 was made on the 300-pound portion of stock from
cooks Nos. 293, 294, 295, and 296, and in essentially the same manner
as run No. 135. The stock was washed one hour, but given a brush
of three hours, and this brush was harder than in run No. 135.
Bleach to the extent of 19.8 per cent of the fiber was used, assisted
by 1 pint of oil of vitriol, and the resulting color was an improvement
over that of run No. 135. After adding 13.5 per cent of clay and
sizing with 1.1 per cent of resin size, the furnish was given one-half
hour’s light brush, tinted, and run on the machine, which was set
at 70 feet per minute. This stock acted better on the wire and gave
no trouble on the machine, but it still seemed to be impossible to
reduce the wood shives by manipulation of the Jordan refiner. The
resulting sheet is an improvement over that produced by No. 135,
but is far from satisfactory.

Run No. 138 was made from hurds which, as in all subsequent tests,
were sieved on a 11½-mesh wire screen until practically all the loose
dirt and sand was removed, which operation caused a loss averaging
3 per cent of the hurds. Stock from cooks Nos. 302 and 303 was
used for this run and the increased amount of caustic soda and the
increase in the time of cooking gave a stock of better appearance than
those of preceding tests.

The stock, amounting to 231 pounds dry weight, was washed and
at the same time given a light brush for one hour only, after which
it was bleached with 17 per cent of bleach without the addition of
acid. Since the preceding paper appeared somewhat weak and had
a low tearing quality, it was decided to use a furnish of 15.7 per cent
bleached sulphite and 84.3 per cent bleached hemp-hurd stock.
After loading with 13.1 per cent of clay and sizing with 1.1 per cent
of resin size, the furnish was given a medium brush for one hour,
tinted, and run on to the machine at 70 feet per minute. The stock
gave no trouble on the machine, but it was impossible to judge the
effect of the Jordan refiner, because through an oversight the machine
chest had not been cleaned since previous use on an unbleached
yucca material. It is believed, however, that sheet No. 138 shows
improvement in the preparation of the hurd pulp.

Run No. 139 was made from stock of cooks Nos. 304 and 305,
in which still more caustic soda was employed and the time and temperature
of cooking were increased, giving a yield of total fiber of
40.7 per cent of the sieved or 39.4 per cent of the unsieved hurds.
The cooked stock still seemed to be undertreated, but it must be
remembered that in working with any new raw material it is impos -19- sible
to know in advance how the properly treated material should
appear. A washing of one hour was given while the roll was lowered
from a light to a medium brush, after which the stock was bleached
with 17.1 per cent of bleach without the aid of acid. Since sulphite
stock improved the previous paper, this bleached stock was used
in a furnish of 16.6 per cent sulphite and 83.4 per cent hurds, loaded
with 16.7 per cent clay, sized with 1.4 per cent resin size, given a
medium brush of two hours, tinted, and run on to the machine at
70 feet per minute. The Jordan refiner seemed to have little effect
in reducing shives and was therefore left “just off.” No trouble was
experienced with the stock on the machine, and the sheet is an
improvement over previous samples.

Run No. 140 was made from cooks Nos. 306 and 307, in which
more caustic soda was employed than in any previous cooks and at a
higher concentration, the fiber yields of which averaged 37.3 per cent
of the unsieved hurds. Not much improvement was apparent in
the cooked stock, in spite of the increased severity of cooking. The
stock was washed and given a medium brush for one hour, bleached
with 11.9 per cent of bleach, assisted with one-half pint of oil of
vitriol, and made into a furnish of 14.9 per cent sulphite and 85.1
per cent of the hurd stock. After loading with 14.7 per cent of clay
and sizing with 1.28 per cent of resin size, the furnish was given two
hours’ medium brush, tinted, and run on to the paper machine at
70 feet per minute. Again the Jordan refiner did not seem to reduce
the wood shives sufficiently, and it was left “just off.” No trouble
which could be attributed to the stock was experienced on the paper
machine. The color of the resulting paper is due to the use of too
little blue in tinting and probably in some measure to the use of too
low a percentage of bleach.

Run No. 141 was made from the stock of cooks Nos. 308 and 309
in practically the same manner as run No. 140. The stock was
washed and brushed one hour, bleached (the record of the amount
of bleach was lost), made into a furnish of 14.7 per cent of sulphite
and 85.3 per cent of hurd stock, loaded with 14.9 per cent of clay,
sized with 1.26 per cent of resin size, given one hour at a medium
brush, tinted, and run on to the machine. The Jordan refiner was
able to reduce the wood shives to a somewhat greater degree than in
previous runs and was held at a medium brush. The stock acted
well on the machine and produced a sheet of better quality than any
preceding, with the exception of the color, which was due to using too
small a quantity of blue.

Among the cooks made for run No. 142 are Nos. 312 and 313, in
which the concentration of the caustic soda was raised to 113 and
116 grams per liter and the percentage employed was also increased.
In spite of these increases the stock from these two cooks did not
show any appreciable improvement when dumped from the
Stock from cooks Nos. 310, 311, and 312 was given a medium brush
and washing of one hour, bleached with 10.95 per cent of bleach,
made into a furnish consisting of 15.2 per cent of sulphite and 84.8
per cent of hurd stock, loaded with 15.2 per cent of clay, sized with
1.28 per cent of resin size, given a medium brush for one hour, tinted,
and pumped to the stock chest. Stock from cooks Nos. 313 and 314
was treated in exactly the same manner, except that 11.4 per cent
of bleach was used. It was pumped to the stock chest and mixed
with the furnished stock from cooks Nos. 310, 311, and 312. A
medium Jordan brush was given the stock and it acted well on the
paper machine, which was speeded to 75 feet per minute. There
seems to be a tendency in the hurd stock to crush a little at the
“dandy roll,” and although the marks are not removed by the calender
stack which was employed in those tests it was found that one
“nip” on the supercalenders renders them practically imperceptible
and it is believed that the proper size and weight of calender stack
would entirely remove these marks. All of the papers produced
up to this point are somewhat lacking in the bulk desired in a book
paper; therefore, in the two following runs soda-poplar stock was
included in the furnishes.

In run No. 143 stock from cooks Nos. 315 and 316 was given a
medium brush and washing for one hour and was medium brushed
for one hour more, bleached with 11.3 per cent of bleach assisted
with one-half pint of oil of vitriol, made into a furnish of 16.5 per
cent of sulphite, 22.3 per cent of soda poplar, and 61.2 per cent of
hurd stock, loaded with 22 per cent of clay, sized with 1.38 per cent
of resin size, given a hard brush for one hour, tinted very strongly,
and pumped to the stock chest. This stock was beaten to a greater
extent than in previous runs. The stock was run on the paper
machine at a speed of 75 feet per minute, using a medium Jordan
brush, and no trouble whatsoever was experienced. Not over 2
pounds of “broke” was produced during the whole run, and that
was in the “threading” of the machine. The color of the sheet is
entirely satisfactory for many uses. The wood shives apparently
were reduced to a satisfactory degree. Experienced paper makers
commented very favorably on the running of this furnish and the
quality of the paper produced.

Run No. 144 was intended as a duplicate of run No. 143. Stock
from cooks Nos. 317 and 318 was given a medium brush and washing
for one hour and a further medium brush of one hour, bleached with
11.4 per cent of bleach, and made into a furnish composed of 15.5
per cent of sulphite, 23.5 per cent of soda poplar, and 61 per cent of
hurd stock, loaded with 21.4 per cent of clay, sized with 1.17 per cent
of resin size, hard brushed for one hour, tinted by the expert colorer
-21- of
the company, and pumped to the stock chest. Stock from cooks
Nos. 319 and 320 was treated in exactly the same manner except
that the stock was bleached with 12.1 per cent of bleach and pumped
to the stock chest to mix with the former furnish. The stock acted
very well on the machine, which was speeded to 75 feet per minute,
with the Jordan refiner set at a medium brush. The sheet is as good,
if not better, than that of run No. 143, and it is also a good illustration
of the extent to which proper tinting will enhance the general
appearance of a paper. The poor appearance of the samples of
previous runs is due largely to lack of proper tinting. Various
degrees of whiteness, however, are demanded by the trade.


In work of this nature and on this scale it is practically impossible
to arrive at a cost figure which would be susceptible of commercial
interpretation, and in this preliminary publication nothing will be
attempted beyond a comparison of the process used with the hurds
with that process commercially applied to poplar wood. The process
last used with the hurds should not be regarded as final, satisfactory,
or most suitable, as it has been shown that progress was being made
up to the conclusion of the work.

In comparing the method of using hurds with the method of handling
poplar wood, a difference is apparent on the delivery of raw
material at the mill. Ordinarily, poplar is received at the mill in
the form of logs about 4 feet in length, which may be stored in piles
in the open. Hurds very likely would be received baled, and it would
seem advisable to store them under cover for the following reasons:
(a) Baled hurds would probably absorb and retain more water
during wet weather than logs of wood, thereby causing excessive
dilution of the caustic liquor; (b) prolonged excessive dampness
might create heating and deterioration unless the hemp were properly
retted; (c) wet hurds could not be sieved free from sand and chaff.
Should further work show that the first two reasons need not be
taken into consideration, the third objection might be overcome by
sieving the hurds before baling. Even then, it is probable that
baled hurds stored in the open would accumulate and retain considerable
dirt from factory chimneys, locomotives, and wind.
Checked pulp wood exposed in the open invariably suffers from
these causes.

In the preparation of the raw material for the digesters there is
likewise considerable difference between hurds and poplar wood.
The former apparently requires only a moderate sieving to remove
sand and chaff, which operation doubtless would require only a
small amount of labor and the installation of some simple machinery
of low power consumption. In preparing poplar for digestion, the
4-foot logs are chipped by a heavy, comparatively
expensive chipper
of high power consumption, after which the chips are sorted by
sieving, the large pieces being rechipped. There would be a noteworthy
difference in the installation, operating, and depreciation
costs of the two equipments, and this difference would counterbalance
to a considerable extent the difference in cost of raw material

It is possible that in the use of the chip loft more care would have
to be exercised in using hurds because of the tendency of the bast
fiber to cause lodgments, but this should not be considered a serious

The weight of hurds which are capable of being charged into a
rotary is a decidedly unfavorable factor. The weight of a cubic
foot of hurds varies somewhat with the proportion of bast fiber,
but averages about 5.4 pounds, which, compared with a cubic foot
of poplar chips at 8.93 pounds, represents a digester charge of 60.5
per cent of the weight of a poplar-wood charge, or, in terms of fiber
capacity, the hurds charge would yield 38.6 per cent as much fiber
as the wood charge. The hurds upon being baled for transportation
may be broken and crushed to such a degree that the weight
of the charge may be increased, and it might be found possible to
increase the charge weight by steaming or by the employment of
tamping devices. This small weight of charge constitutes one of the
most serious objections to the use of hurds in paper manufacture.

In those tests in which the most satisfactory results were obtained,
the cooking conditions were 29.5 per cent of caustic soda at a concentration
of 107 grams per liter and a causticity of 84.0 per cent acting
at a temperature of 170° C. for five hours, or a total time of seven
hours. The steam condensation in the rotary used for these tests
was abnormally high, due to the fact that the steam supply pipe was
uncovered for a considerable distance and the rotary was entirely
uncovered. It is believed, therefore, that a larger amount of caustic
was necessary than would otherwise have been the case. This
belief is strengthened by the quality of the waste liquor from one of
the later cooks, which gave on analysis 16.85 grams per liter of free
caustic soda and showed a causticity of 27.75 per cent. These data
show that only 67.3 per cent of the total caustic employed was actually
consumed in the cooking operation, which percentage is lower
than obtains in practice. The stock from this cook was bleached
with 11.5 per cent of bleach. But even as the figures stand, the
comparison with poplar cooking practice is as follows: 29.5 per cent
caustic soda used as against 22 to 25 per cent; 107 grams per liter
as against 100 to 110; 84 per cent causticity is little different than
obtains in practice; 170° C. is about commercial practice; five hours
at pressure as against four to six hours; seven hours’ total time as
against possibly six to eight hours; 11.5 per cent bleach
as against
8 to 10 per cent. Thus, it is evident that the cooking conditions
employed were slightly more severe and expensive than those in
commercial use with poplar wood.

The yield of total fiber obtained from the hurds may be placed at
35 per cent of bone-dry fiber calculated on the bone-dry weight of
hurds used, or 33.1 per cent of air-dry fiber calculated on air-dry
hurds. The yield of bleached fiber was not determined in this preliminary
work, but may be safely estimated as 30 per cent, which is
low when compared with a yield of about 47 per cent of bone-dry
bleached fiber from bone-dry poplar wood. It is believed quite
possible that satisfactory cooking conditions may be found which will
give a higher yield than was obtained during these tests. The stock
should be classed as easy bleaching, and 11.4 per cent of bleach is a
satisfactory figure, although a little high.

As to beating cost, in the last two and most satisfactory tests the
total washing and beating time was three hours, which may be about
an hour more than ordinarily is used in making papers of this grade,
although the practice varies to a considerable extent.

In regard to furnish, there is such a diversity of practice that it is
difficult to make a comparison, but if the hurd stock can be produced
as cheaply as soda-poplar stock, the furnish used in these last two
tests should be regarded as satisfactory to the book and printing
paper manufacturer.

The finish of the paper was not all that might be desired, but that
was due almost entirely to the calender stack available for the work,
which was composed of nine light rolls, many of which were about
6 inches in diameter and which had not been reground for some time.
From a small test on a large calender stack it was readily shown that
the paper produced is capable of taking a satisfactory finish.

This comparison, satisfactory in many respects, develops two
factors which are decidedly unfavorable to hemp hurds, namely, raw-material
storage and digester capacity, and they must be taken into
full account in considering the paper-making value of this material,
although it should be recognized that investigation may result in the
material improvement of these conditions. Moreover, it is not at all
improbable that further investigation would develop more satisfactory
treating conditions and more suitable furnish compositions, and
the belief in this possibility is strengthened by the fact that material
progress was being made at the conclusion of this preliminary work.

Calculations on the raw material and acreage for a permanent supply
for a pulp mill producing 25 tons of fiber a day for 300 days per
annum, or 7,500 tons per annum, give the comparison between hurds
and wood shown in Table II.

Table II.—Comparison
between wood and hemp hurds

Material. Pulp yield. Raw
material required per year.
Annual growth per acre. Acres required for sustained
For 25-ton mill. For 1 ton of fiber per
Wood Two cords yield 1 ton of
15,000 cords 0.37 cord (about 0.55 ton). 40,500 5.4
Hemp hurds One ton yields 600
pounds of fiber.
25,000 tons 2.5 tons 10,000 1.33

The most important point derived from this calculation is in regard
to areas required for a sustained supply, which are in the ratio of 4
to 1. Every tract of 10,000 acres which is devoted to hemp raising
year by year is equivalent to a sustained pulp-producing capacity of
40,500 acres of average pulp-wood lands. In other words, in order to
secure additional raw material for the production of 25 tons of fiber
per day there exists the possibility of utilizing the agricultural waste
already produced on 10,000 acres of hemp lands instead of securing,
holding, reforesting, and protecting 40,500 acres of pulp-wood land.

The annual growth per acre, although decidedly in favor of hurds,
has little bearing on the project, because the utilization of the hurds
is subordinate to the raising of hemp, and the paper manufacturer
probably could afford to use only hurds resulting from the hemp


Samples of paper produced in the seven tests were submitted to
the Leather and Paper Laboratory of the Bureau of Chemistry. The
report of that bureau on its tests is given in Table III.

Table III.—Report of the
Leather and Paper Laboratory of the Bureau of Chemistry on
papers manufactured from hemp hurds

Laboratory No. Run
Ash. Weight of 500 sheets. Thickness, 1/10000. Strength (Mullen). Strength factor (25 by 40, 500). Folding endurance.
25 by 38. 25 by 40. Average. Maximum. Minimum. Longitudinal. Transverse.
    Per ct. Pounds. Pounds.              
31570 144 13.9 48 50½ 33 15.0 17.0 11.0 0.30 5 3
31571 143 14.5 49 51½ 35 14.0 14.0 13.0 .28 4 4
31573 141 10.9 48 50½ 38 19.0 20.0 19.0 .37 8 6
31572 142 9.5 49½ 52 33 16.5 18.0 11.0 .33 10 8
31574 140 11.4 42 44 30 14.5 16.0 13.0 .33 7 6
31575 139 13.4 55 58 40 19.5 20.0 17.0 .34 8 5
31576 138 10.4 56 59 40 20.0 20.0 19.0 .34 23 15

There is no system of numerically recording the general appearance
and “look through” of a paper, but it can be stated that only papers
Nos. 143 and 144 are satisfactory in these respects, the
other samples
being more or less thickly specked with shives. The general
character and tests of these papers correspond very closely with
No. 1 machine-finish printing paper, according to the specifications
of the United States Government Printing Office, which call for a
sheet not exceeding 0.0035 inch in thickness, strength not less than
12 points, free from unbleached or ground wood pulp, and ash not
over 10 per cent. The strength factor of such papers is about 0.28.
The ash should not be over 10 per cent for this grade of paper, but
in spite of the larger amount used the physical tests are sufficiently
high. It is to be noted that the physical tests of samples Nos. 138
to 142, inclusive, are higher than in Nos. 143 and 144, in which 23
per cent of soda poplar was used, which shows clearly that hemp-hurd
stock imparts strength and folding endurance to a greater
extent than does soda-poplar stock. From these preliminary tests it
would be concluded, therefore, that hemp-hurd stock acts similarly
to soda-poplar stock, but will produce a somewhat harsher and
stronger sheet and one of higher folding endurance. Undoubtedly,
there is more dirt in the samples than would be tolerated by the
trade, but this was to be expected, since in this preliminary work the
raw material was sieved by hand screens instead of by automatic
machines which would sieve more thoroughly.


There appears to be little doubt that under the present system of
forest use and consumption the present supply can not withstand
the demands placed upon it. By the time improved methods of
forestry have established an equilibrium between production and
consumption, the price of pulp wood may be such that a knowledge
of other available raw materials may be imperative.

Semicommercial paper-making tests were conducted, therefore, on
hemp hurds, in cooperation with a paper manufacturer. After
several trials, under conditions of treatment and manufacture which
are regarded as favorable in comparison with those used with pulp
wood, paper was produced which received very favorable comment
both from investigators and from the trade and which according to
official tests would be classed as a No. 1 machine-finish printing


End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Hemp Hurds as Paper-Making Material, by 
Lyster H. Dewey and Jason L. Merrill


***** This file should be named 17855-h.htm or 17855-h.zip *****
This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:

Produced by K.D. Thornton and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net

Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
will be renamed.

Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
permission and without paying copyright royalties.  Special rules,
set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark.  Project
Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission.  If you
do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
rules is very easy.  You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
research.  They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks.  Redistribution is
subject to the trademark license, especially commercial



To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at

Section 1.  General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic works

1.A.  By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement.  If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B.  "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark.  It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement.  There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement.  See
paragraph 1.C below.  There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
works.  See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C.  The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic works.  Nearly all the individual works in the
collection are in the public domain in the United States.  If an
individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
are removed.  Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
the work.  You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.

1.D.  The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work.  Copyright laws in most countries are in
a constant state of change.  If you are outside the United States, check
the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
Gutenberg-tm work.  The Foundation makes no representations concerning
the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United

1.E.  Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1.  The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org

1.E.2.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
or charges.  If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or

1.E.3.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
terms imposed by the copyright holder.  Additional terms will be linked
to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.

1.E.4.  Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.

1.E.5.  Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg-tm License.

1.E.6.  You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
word processing or hypertext form.  However, if you provide access to or
distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
form.  Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7.  Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8.  You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided

- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
     the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
     you already use to calculate your applicable taxes.  The fee is
     owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
     has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
     Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.  Royalty payments
     must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
     prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
     returns.  Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
     sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
     address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
     the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."

- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
     you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
     does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
     License.  You must require such a user to return or
     destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
     and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
     Project Gutenberg-tm works.

- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
     money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
     electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
     of receipt of the work.

- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
     distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.

1.E.9.  If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark.  Contact the
Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.


1.F.1.  Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
collection.  Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
your equipment.

of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal

defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
written explanation to the person you received the work from.  If you
received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
your written explanation.  The person or entity that provided you with
the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
refund.  If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.  If the second copy
is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4.  Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER

1.F.5.  Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
the applicable state law.  The invalidity or unenforceability of any
provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6.  INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.

Section  2.  Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm

Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers.  It exists
because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
remain freely available for generations to come.  In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.

Section 3.  Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service.  The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541.  Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
http://pglaf.org/fundraising.  Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.

The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
throughout numerous locations.  Its business office is located at
809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
business@pglaf.org.  Email contact links and up to date contact
information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
page at http://pglaf.org

For additional contact information:
     Dr. Gregory B. Newby
     Chief Executive and Director

Section 4.  Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment.  Many small donations
($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States.  Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
with these requirements.  We do not solicit donations in locations
where we have not received written confirmation of compliance.  To
SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
particular state visit http://pglaf.org

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States.  U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
methods and addresses.  Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations.  To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate

Section 5.  General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic

Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
with anyone.  For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
unless a copyright notice is included.  Thus, we do not necessarily
keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.

Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:


This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.